Abstract
In this article, I assess the current state of evolutionary aesthetics by reviewing four recent books by scholars in art history, literary studies, and psychology. Each book is humanistic in a broad sense. They all address evolutionary themes and share a commitment to understanding aesthetic experience via methodological pluralism, but they differ substantially in perspective and tone. That of Cupchik, a psychologist, expansively discusses the aesthetics of emotion. That of Rampley, an art historian, is the most polemical, with a strong critique of the encroachment of biology into questions of cultural history. Those of Hogan and Aldama, both literary scholars, deal primarily with literature and are the most personal and ultimately the most thought-provoking. The collective humanistic perspective is a departure from more neuroscience-intensive recent volumes, and it highlights the importance of themes like the emergence of aesthetics from the interaction between nature and culture—potentially in different ways at different times throughout the phylogenetic history of our species.
Works Cited
Chatterjee, Anjan. 2014. The Aesthetic Brain: How We Evolved to Desire Beauty and Enjoy Art. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199811809.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1859. On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray.Search in Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.10.5962/bhl.title.24784Search in Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 2006. The God Delusion. New York: Bantam.Search in Google Scholar
Dissanayake, Ellen. 2000. Art and Intimacy: How the Arts Began. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Search in Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von (1790) 1988. “The Metamorphosis of Plants.” In Goethe: Scientific Studies, ed. and trans. Douglas Miller, 76–97. New York: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von (1809) 1962. Faust. Translated by Walter Kauffman. New York: Anchor.Search in Google Scholar
Goren-Inbar, Naama, and Peltz, S.1995. “Additional Remarks on the Berekhat Ram Figurine.”Rock Art Research12:131–32.Search in Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen J.1993. Eight Little Piggies. London: Jonathan Cape.Search in Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen J., and Lewontin, Richard C.1979. “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences205 (1161): 581–98.Search in Google Scholar
Hugo, Victor. (1864) 1899. William Shakespeare. Translated by Melville B. Anderson. Chicago: A. C. McClurg and Company.Search in Google Scholar
Kozbelt, Aaron. 2009. “The Evolution of Evolvability, Applied to Human Creativity.”International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving19 (1): 101–21.Search in Google Scholar
Kozbelt, Aaron. 2011. “Neuroaesthetics: Where Things Stand Now.”The Evolutionary Review2:137–46.Search in Google Scholar
Kozbelt, Aaron. 2017. “Neuroaesthetics: The State of the Domain in 2017.”Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture1 (1).10.26613/esic.1.1.25Search in Google Scholar
Lauring, Jon O. (ed.). 2014. An Introduction to Neuroaesthetics. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lewis-Williams, David. 2002. The Mind in the Cave: Consciousness and the Origin of Art. London: Thames and Hudson.Search in Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 2000. Art as a Social System. Translated by Eva Knodt. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mithen, Stephen. 1996. The Prehistory of the Mind: The Cognitive Origins of Art and Science. London: Thames and Hudson.Search in Google Scholar
Morin, Olivier. 2013. “How Portraits Turned Their Eyes upon Us: Visual Preferences and Demographic Change in Cultural Evolution.”Evolution and Human Behavior34:222–29.10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.01.004Search in Google Scholar
Onians, John. 2008. Neuroarthistory: From Aristotle and Pliny to Baxandall and Zeki. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 2002. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Shimamura, Arthur P., and Stephen E. Palmer (eds.). 2012. Aesthetic Science: Connecting Minds, Brains, and Experience. New York: Oxford University Press10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732142.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Starr, G. Gabrielle. 1959. The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Starr, G. Gabrielle. 2013. Feeling Beauty: The Neuroscience of Aesthetic Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262019316.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Vos, Piet G., and Jim M. Troost. 1989. “Ascending and Descending Melodic Intervals: Statistical Findings and Their Perceptual Relevance.”Music Perception6:383–96.10.2307/40285439Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O.1998. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Academic Studies Press
