Abstract
From the time of its discovery, evolutionary theory has been shaped into dramatic narratives with human goals and value structures. Why has it been treated this way, often by its scientific proponents? Modern evolutionary psychology provides an answer. By appealing to universal human concerns, stories help map out the physical and social world, imbuing it with positive and negative values, visions of desirable and undesirable ways of life. Evolutionary theory contains no such imaginative mapping. As a nonmythological account of humanity, it poses a universal challenge to the human mind, even as it stimulates by revealing unimagined facts. Darwin's contemporaries were the first to negotiate that balance. The new human self-narratives they created can help us understand the challenge we still face. In this article, I analyze two such narratives: one in T. H. Huxley's scientific monograph Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature (1863) and one in Arthur Conan Doyle's adventure novel The Lost World (1912).
Works Cited
Beer, Gillian. (1983) 2009. Darwin's Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511770401.10.1017/CBO9780511770401Search in Google Scholar
Boehm, Christopher. 1997. “Impact of the Human Egalitarian Syndrome on Darwinian Selection Mechanics.”The American Naturalist150 (S1): 100–21. doi:10.1086/286052.10.1086/286052Search in Google Scholar
Boyd, Brian. 2009. On the Origin of Stories: Evolution, Cognition, and Fiction. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctvjf9xvkSearch in Google Scholar
Carroll, Joseph. 2012a. “The Adaptive Function of the Arts: Alternative Evolutionary Hypotheses.” In Telling Stories: Literature and Evolution, edited by Carsten Gansel and Dirk Vanderbeke, 50–63. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110268683.10.1515/9783110268683Search in Google Scholar
Carroll, Joseph. 2012b. “The Truth about Fiction: Biological Reality and Imaginary Lives.”Style46 (2): 129–60.Search in Google Scholar
Carroll, Joseph. 2013. “Violence in Literature: An Evolutionary Perspective.” In The Evolution of Violence, edited by Todd Shackelford and Ranald D. Hansen, 33–52. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-9314-3_3Search in Google Scholar
Carroll, Joseph, Jonathan Gottschall, John Johnson, and Dan Kruger. 2012. Graphing Jane Austen: The Evolutionary Basis of Literary Meaning. Cognitive Studies in Literature and Performance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137002419.10.1057/9781137002419Search in Google Scholar
Dalziell, Rosamund. 2002. “The Curious Case of Sir Everard im Thurn and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle: Exploration and the Imperial Adventure Novel, The Lost World. English Literature in Transition, 1880–192045 (2): 131–57.Search in Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1863. “Letter to T. H. Huxley on 26 February 1863.”Darwin Correspondence Database. “Letter no. 4013.” University of Cambridge. https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-4013.xml.Search in Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1864. “Letter to T. H. Huxley on 5 November 1864.”Darwin Correspondence Database. “Letter no. 4661.” University of Cambridge. http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/DCP-LETT-4661.Search in Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. (1871) 1981. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.5962/bhl.title.2092Search in Google Scholar
Dissanayake, Ellen. 2000. Art and Intimacy: How the Arts Began. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Search in Google Scholar
Doyle, Arthur Conan. (1912) 2012. The Lost World (Classic Reprint). London: Forgotten Books.Search in Google Scholar
Dutton, Denis. 2009. The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, & Human Evolution. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Search in Google Scholar
Forman, Ross G.2010. “Room for Romance: Playing with Adventure in Arthur Conan Doyle's The Lost World. Genre43 (1): 27–59. doi:10.1215/00166928-43-1-2-27.10.1215/00166928-43-1-2-27Search in Google Scholar
Geary, David C.2007. “The Motivation to Control and the Evolution of General Intelligence.” In The Evolution of Mind: Fundamental Questions and Controversies, edited by Steven W. Gangestad and Jeffry A. Simpson, 305–13. New York: Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gottschall, Jonathan. 2008. The Rape of Troy: Evolution, Violence, and the World of Homer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gottschall, Jonathan. 2012. The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar
Griskevicius, Vladas, Stephanie M. Cantú, and Mark van Vugt. 2012. “The Evolutionary Bases for Sustainable Behavior: Implications for Marketing, Policy, and Social Entrepreneurship.”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing31 (1): 115–28. doi:10.1509/jppm.11.040.10.1509/jppm.11.040Search in Google Scholar
Haselton, Martie G., and Daniel Nettle. 2006. “The Paranoid Optimist: An Integrative Evolutionary Model of Cognitive Biases.”Personality and Social Psychology Review10 (1): 47–66. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3.10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3Search in Google Scholar
Hawkins, Mike. 1998. Social Darwinism in European and American Thought, 1860–1945: Nature as Model and Nature as Threat. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511558481Search in Google Scholar
Henkin, Leo J. (1940) 1963. Darwinism in the English Novel, 1860–1910: The Impact of Evolution on Victorian Fiction. New York: Russell & Russell.Search in Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. (1863) 2009. Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511703539.10.1017/CBO9780511703539Search in Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. (1893) 2009. Evolution and Ethics: Delivered in the Sheldonian Theatre, May 18, 1893. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511703522Search in Google Scholar
Kerr, Douglas. 2016. “Conan Doyle's Challenger Tales and the End of the World.”English Literature in Transition, 1880–192059 (1): 3–24.Search in Google Scholar
Levine, George. 1988 (1991). Darwin and the Novelists: Patterns of Science in Victorian Fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
McAdams, Dan P., and Kate C. McLean. 2013. “Narrative Identity.”Current Directions in Psychological Science22 (3): 233–38. doi:10.1177/0963721413475622.10.1177/0963721413475622Search in Google Scholar
Richards, Robert J.2009. The Tragic Sense of Life: Ernst Haeckel and the Struggle over Evolutionary Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226712192.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Ruddick, Nicholas. 2009. The Fire in the Stone: Prehistoric Fiction from Charles Darwin to Jean M. Auel. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stevenson, Lionel. 1963. Darwin among the Poets. New York: Russell & Russell.Search in Google Scholar
Stillweli, Arlene M., and Roy F. Baumeister. 1997. “The Construction of Victim and Perpetrator Memories: Accuracy and Distortion in Role-Based Accounts.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 23 (11): 1157–72. doi:10.1177/01461672972311004.10.1177/01461672972311004Search in Google Scholar
Willard, Aiyana K., and Ara Norenzayan. 2013. “Cognitive Biases Explain Religious Belief, Paranormal Belief, and Belief in Life's Purpose.”Cognition129 (2): 379–91. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.016.10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.016Search in Google Scholar
Wong, Amy R.2015. “Arthur Conan Doyle's ‘Great New Adventure Story’: Journalism in The Lost World.”Studies in the Novel47 (1): 60–79. doi:10.1353/sdn.2015.0011.10.1353/sdn.2015.0011Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Academic Studies Press
