Reviewed Publication:
Prum, Richard O. 2017. The Evolution of Beauty: How Darwin's Forgotten Theory of Mate Choice Shapes the Animal World—and Us. New York: Doubleday. 448 pages. Hardcover $30.00.
Works Cited
Coss, Richard G., and Ronald O. Goldthwaite. 1995. “The Persistence of Old Designs for Perception.” In Perspectives in Ethology 11: Behavioral Design, edited by Nicholas S. Thompson, 83–148. New York: Plenum.Search in Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Vol. 2. London: Murray. https://teoriaevolutiva.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/darwin-c-the-descent-of-man-and-selection-in-relation-to-sex.pdf.10.1037/12294-000Search in Google Scholar
Endler, John A., and Alexandra L. Basolo. 1998. “Sensory Ecology, Receiver Biases and Sexual Selection.”TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution13 (10): 415–30. doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01471-2.10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01471-2Search in Google Scholar
Endler, John A., Lorna C. Endler, and Natalie R. Doerr. 2010. “Great Bowerbirds Create Theaters with Forced Perspective When Seen by Their Audience.”Current Biology20 (18): 1679–84. doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.033.10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.033Search in Google Scholar
Fink, Bernhard, Nick Neave, John T. Manning, and Karl Grammer. 2006. “Facial Symmetry and Judgements of Attractiveness, Health and Personality.”Personality and Individual Differences41 (3): 491–99. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.017.10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.017Search in Google Scholar
Fisher, Ronald A.1915. “The Evolution of Sexual Preferences.”Eugenics Review7: 184–92.Search in Google Scholar
Grafen, Alan. 1990. “Sexual Selection Unhandicapped by the Fisher Process.”Journal of Theoretical Biology144 (4): 473–516. doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80087–6.10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80087-6Search in Google Scholar
Jones, B. C., A. C. Little, I. S. Penton-Voak, B. P. Tiddeman, D. M. Burt, and D. I. Perrett. 2001. “Facial Symmetry and Judgements of Apparent Health Support for a ‘Good Genes’ Explanation of the Attractiveness—Symmetry Relationship.”Evolution and Human Behavior22 (6): 417–29. doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00083–6.Search in Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Mark. 1982. “Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Female Choice.”Evolution36 (1): 1–12.10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05003.xSearch in Google Scholar
Lande, Russell. 1981. “Models of Speciation by Sexual Selection of Polygenic Traits.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA78 (6): 3721–25.10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721Search in Google Scholar
Meehl, Paul E.1990. “Appraising and Amending Theories: The Strategy of Lakatosian Defense and Two Principles That Warrant It.”Psychological Inquiry1 (2): 108–41. doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0102_1.10.1207/s15327965pli0102_1Search in Google Scholar
Ten Cate, Carel, and Candy Rowe. 2007. “Biases in Signal Evolution: Learning Makes a Difference.”TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution22 (7): 380–87. doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.03.006.10.1016/j.tree.2007.03.006Search in Google Scholar
Wagner, Allan R.2008. “Some Observations and Remembrances of Kenneth W. Spence. Learning and Behavior36 (3): 169–73. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/LB.36.3.169.10.3758/LB.36.3.169Search in Google Scholar
Wallace, Alfred R.1889. Darwinism, An Exponent of the Theory of Natural Selection with Some of its Applications. London: Macmillan.10.5962/bhl.title.2472Search in Google Scholar
Zahavi, Amotz. 1975. “Mate Selection—A Selection for a Handicap.”Journal of Theoretical Biology53 (1): 205–14. doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3.10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Academic Studies Press