Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by Academic Studies Press October 1, 2018

Aesthetics and Fetishism: Key Stimuli and Power Objects

  • Henrik Høgh-Olesen

Abstract

A fetish is a specific emotionally loaded object, body part, or situation that draws our attention and desire, and sexual fetishism is the sexual arousal that a person experiences when in contact with such a loaded object. Until now, psychology has had trouble understanding the distinctive lust objects and the orchestration of urges in the world of fetishism, so fetishism has therefore fallen into the category of perversions and abnormal behavior. In this study, fetishism is moved to the field of aesthetics, and a new theory is presented: Fetishism is the attraction to certain species-specific key stimuli that are perceived as especially beautiful and exciting. A topic or an object that contains important key stimuli automatically becomes a power object or a fetish. Therefore, we have to look into the innate sensibilities on which our aesthetics are based and into the micro-processes of the aesthetic impulse to understand why something captivates and fascinates us in a fetishist way.

Works Cited

Anderson, Cameron, John A. D. Hildreth, and Laura Howland. 2015. “Is the Desire for Status a Fundamental Human Motive?”Psychological Bulletin141 (3): 574601. doi.org/10.1037/a0038781.10.1037/a0038781Search in Google Scholar

Akins, Chana K.2004. “The Role of Pavlovian Conditioning in Sexual Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of Human and Nonhuman Animals.”Internationaljournal of Comparative Psychology17 (2): 24162.Search in Google Scholar

Aronson, Hanna. 2011. “Sexual Imprinting and Fetishism.” In Maladaptive Minds, edited by Pieter R. Adrians and Andreas de Block, 6590. NY: Oxford University Press. doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199558667.003.0003.Search in Google Scholar

Boyer, Pascal, and Pierre Liénard. 2006. “Why Ritualized Behavior? Precaution Systems and Action Parsing in Developmental, Pathological and Cultural Rituals.”Behavior and Brain Sciences29: 156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06009332.10.1017/S0140525X06009332Search in Google Scholar

Bullough, Vern L.1995. Science in the Bedroom: A History of Sex Research. NY: Basic Books. doi.org/10.1126/science.268.5213.1007.Search in Google Scholar

Buss, David M.2003. The Evolution of Desire. NY: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Chatterjee, Anjan. 2014. The Aesthetic Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clasen, Mathias. 2012. “Monsters Evolve: A Biocultural Approach to Horror Stories.”Review of General Psychology16 (2): 222229. doi.org/10.1037/a0027918.10.1037/a0027918Search in Google Scholar

Coss, Richard G.1968. “The Ethological Command in Art.”Leonardo1: 273287. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1150.10.2307/1571871Search in Google Scholar

Coss, Richard G.2003. “The Role of Evolved Perceptual Biases in Art.” In Evolutionary Aesthetics, edited by Eckart Voland and Karl Grammer, 197213. Berlin: Springer. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07142-7_4.Search in Google Scholar

Costa, Marco, and Leonardo Corazza. 2006. “Aesthetic Phenomena as Supernormal Stimuli.”Perception35: 229246. doi.org/10.1068/p3449.10.1068/p3449Search in Google Scholar

Eibl-Eibesfeldt, Irenä eus.1989. Human Ethology. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction. doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(89)90033-2.Search in Google Scholar

Elliot, Andrew J., and Daniela Niesta. 2008. “Romantic Red: Red Enhances Men's Attraction to Women.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95 (5): 115064. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1150.10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1150Search in Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. 1928. “Fetishism.”The International Journal of Psychoanalysis9: 16166.Search in Google Scholar

Griffiths, Mark D. (2014). “Survival of the Fetish.”Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-excess/201401/survival-the-fetish.Search in Google Scholar

Guthrie, R. Dale. 2005. The Nature of Paleolithic Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harper, David. 2014. Fetish. The Online Etymological Dictionary. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=fetish.Search in Google Scholar

Heinrich, Bernd. 2013. “The Biological Roots of Aesthetics and Art.”Evolutionary Psychology11(3):743761. doi. org/10.1177/147470491301100316.10.1177/147470491301100316Search in Google Scholar

Høgh-Olesen, Henrik. (2018). The Aesthetic Animal. NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190927929.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kayser, Daniela N., Andrew J. Elliot, and Roger Feltman. 2010. “Red and Romantic Behavior in Men Viewing Women.”European Journal of Social Psychology40: 901908. doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.757.10.1002/ejsp.757Search in Google Scholar

Li, Qian, and Stephen D. Liberles. 2015. “Aversion and Attraction through Olfaction.”Current Biology25 (3): 12029. doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.044.10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.044Search in Google Scholar

Lorenz, Konrad. 1931. “Beiträ ge zur Ethologie sozialer Corviden.”Journal of Ornithology79: 67120. doi. org/10.1007/BF01950950.10.1007/BF01950950Search in Google Scholar

Lorenz, Konrad. 1981. The Foundations of Ethology. NY: Springer Verlag. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-3671-3.Search in Google Scholar

Lynn, Spencer K.2010. “Decision-Making and Learning: The Peakshift Behavioural Response.”Encyclopaedia of Animal Behavior1: 47075. doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-045337-8.00146-7.10.1016/B978-0-08-045337-8.00146-7Search in Google Scholar

Marlowe, Frank, Coren Apicella, and Dorian Reed. 2005. “Men's Preferences for Women's Profile Waist-to-Hip Ratio in Two Societies.”Evolution and Human Behavior26 (6): 45868. doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.005.10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.005Search in Google Scholar

Martindale, Colin. 1990. The Clockwork Muse. NY: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Maruyama, Magoroh. 1963. “The Second Cybernetics.”American Scientist51 (2): 1641.Search in Google Scholar

Milgram, Stanley. 1963. “Behavioral Study of Obedience.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology67 (4): 371378. doi.org/10.1037/h004052510.1037/h0040525Search in Google Scholar

Milgram, Stanley. 1974. Obedience to Authority. NY: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar

Morris, Desmond. 1969. The Human Zoo. NY: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Orians, Gordon H.2001. “An Evolutionary Perspective on Aesthetics.”Bulletin of Psychology & the Arts2 (1): 2529.Search in Google Scholar

Ramachandran, Vilayanur S., and Sandra Blakeslee. 1999. Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind. NY: HarperSearch in Google Scholar

Sebeok, Thomas A.1989. “The Word ‘Fetish’ and Its Uses in Anthropology.”The American Journal of Semiotics6 (4): 5165. doi.org/10.5840/ajs1989644.10.5840/ajs1989644Search in Google Scholar

Singh, Devendra. 1993. “Adaptive Significance of Waist-to-Hip Ratio and Female Physical Attractiveness.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology65 (2): 293307. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.29310.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293Search in Google Scholar

Singh, Devendra. 1995. “Female Health, Attractiveness, and Desirability for Relationships.”Ethology and Sociobiology16 (6): 46581. doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(95)00073-9.10.1016/0162-3095(95)00073-9Search in Google Scholar

Singh, Devendra, and Suwardi Luis. 1995. “Ethnic and Gender Consensus for the Effect of Waist-to-Hip Ratio on Judgement of Women's Attractiveness.”Human Nature, 6 (1): 5165. doi.org/10.1007/BF02734135.10.1007/BF02734135Search in Google Scholar

Staddon, John E. R.1975. “A Note on the Evolutionary Significance of ‘Supernormal’ Stimuli.”The American Naturalist109 (969): 541545. doi.org/10.1086/283025.10.1086/283025Search in Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Nico. 1951. The Study of Instinct. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Voland, Eckart, and Karl Grammer, editors. (2003). Evolutionary Aesthetics. Berlin: Springer. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07142-7.10.1007/978-3-662-07142-7Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Glenn D.1987. “An Ethological Approach to Sexual Deviation.” In Variant Sexuality: Research and Theory, edited by Glenn D. Wilson, 84115. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-10-01
Published in Print: 2018-10-01

© 2018 Academic Studies Press

Downloaded on 20.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.26613/esic.2.2.90/html
Scroll to top button