Skip to content
BY-NC 4.0 license Open Access Published by Academic Studies Press October 1, 2018

Get Shorty: Steven Pinker on the Enlightenment

  • Geoffrey Galt Harpham

Abstract

Steven Pinker's Enlightenment Now makes a powerful argument that by every measure, the conditions of human life have been improving steadily for the past 200 years. This improvement can be attributed not just to the spread of the principles of enlightenment announced in the eighteenth century but also to the evolved properties of the human mind, which have been liberated by modernity. Pinker writes in support of this development and in opposition to the ideological and academic resistances to it. His book has itself generated resistance among those he criticizes, and while many of these criticisms are unwarranted, Pinker's book raises serious questions that it does not fully address.

Works Cited

Bell, David A.2018. “The PowerPoint Philosophe.”The Nation07March: https://www.thenation.com/article/waiting-for-steven-pinkers-enlightenment/.Search in Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. 1969. “Theses on the Philosophy of History.” In Hannah Arendt, ed., Illuminations, 25364. New York: Shocken Books.Search in Google Scholar

Carey, M., Jackson, M., Antonello, A., & Rushing, J.2016. “Glaciers, Gender, and Science.”Progress in Human Geography40.6, 77093.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1977. Language and Responsibility. Based on conversations with Mitsou Ronat; trans. John Viertel. New York: Pantheon Books, 1977.Search in Google Scholar

Gates, Bill. 2018. “My New Favorite Book of all Time.”Gatesnotes26January: https://www.gatesnotes.com/Books/Enlightenment-Now.Search in Google Scholar

Gray, John. 2018. “Unenlightened Thinking: Steven Pinker's Embarrassing New Book is a Feeble Sermon for Rattled Liberals.”The New Statesman22February: https://www.newstatesman.com/culture/books/2018/02/unenlightened-thinking-steven-pinker-s-embarrassing-new-book-feeble-sermon.Search in Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian. 1994a. “What's Best.”London Review of Books27January: 1718.Search in Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian. 1994b. Reply to Robert Nozick. London Review of Books24March: 4.Search in Google Scholar

Hume, David. 2007. A Treatise on Human Nature: A Critical Edition. Ed. David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton. Oxford UK: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Janicaud, Dominique. 1994. Powers of the Rational: Science, Technology, and the Future of Thought. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1954. “On Truth and Lies in an Extra-Moral Sense.” In Walter Kaufmann, ed., The Portable Nietzsche, 4246. New York: Viking Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nozick, Robert. 1993. The Nature of Rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nozick, Robert. 1994. Reply to Ian Hacking. London Review of Books, 10March: 45.Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 1994. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York: William Morrow & Company.10.1037/e412952005-009Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 2011. The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. New York: Viking.Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven, and P. Bloom, P.1990. “Natural Language and Natural Selection.”Behavioral and Brain Sciences13.4: 707784.10.1017/S0140525X00081061Search in Google Scholar

Semley, John. 2018. “Review: In Enlightenment Now, Steven Pinker Would Like you to Know that Everything—Everything—is Okay.”The Globe and Mail, 28February: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/book-reviews/review-in-enlightenment-now-steven-pinker-would-like-you-to-know-that-every-thing-everything-is-okay/article38143784/.Search in Google Scholar

Sontag, Susan. 1969. “Some Thoughts on the Right Way (for us) to Love the Cuban Revolution.”RampartsApril: 1619.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, Nick. 2018. “Enlightenment and Progress, or Why Steven Pinker is Wrong.” At: https://www.theosthinktank.co.uk/comment/2018/02/20/enlightenment-and-progress-or-why-steven-pinker-is-wrong.Search in Google Scholar

Szalai, Jennifer. 2018. “Steven Pinker Wants You to Know Humanity is Doing Fine. Just Don't Ask about Individual Humans.”New York Times, 28February; https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/28/books/review-enlighten-ment-now-steven-pinker.html.Search in Google Scholar

Trump, Donald J.2016. Acceptance speech at Republican National Convention (“I alone can fix it”): http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/full-text-donald-trumps-2016-republican-national-convention/story?id=40786529.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-10-01
Published in Print: 2018-10-01

© 2018 Academic Studies Press

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 20.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.26613/esic.2.2.95/html
Scroll to top button