Recycling Leftover Fabrics using the Art of Khayamiya to Enrich the Aesthetic Value of Home Furnishings

Abstract

The research aimed to produce different and modern designs using the art of tents, and to enrich the aesthetic value used the art of tents in doing the work of these designs, has been using the descriptive approach in the study of types of furnishings, and experimental and analytical in the analysis and innovation of designs, where the researchers invented (10) designs vary in terms of the units used and the type of furniture designed for them, and presented to a sample of arbitrators for evaluation in terms of the foundations and elements of evaluation and the aesthetic, functional and design aspect, the researchers have prepared a questionnaire directed to the arbitrators to arbitrate the designs The questionnaire included the height of three axes, and the average evaluation was determined according to the opinions of the arbitrators and the quality coefficients of the proposed designs were determined, and the results resulted in the following:

1- The best proposed designs in achieving the aesthetic aspect, according to the opinions of the design arbitrators (2.6), where they achieved quality coefficients by an excellent percentage (93.6), and the least proposed designs in achieving the aesthetic aspect is design (8), where it achieved a quality factor of (85.8).

2- The best proposed designs in achieving the functional aspect, according to the opinions of the arbitrators Design (5), where it achieved quality coefficients by an excellent percentage (90), and the least proposed designs in achieving the functional aspect is Design (1), where it achieved a quality factor of (80.6).

3- The best proposed designs in achieving the design aspect, according to the opinions of the arbitrators Design (7), where it achieved quality coefficients by an excellent percentage of (93.1), and the least proposed designs in achieving the design aspect is a design (8.6), where they achieved quality coefficients by (85.3).

4- The best proposed designs in the aspects of evaluation as a whole, according to the opinions of the arbitrators Design (5), where it achieved quality factors by an excellent percentage (92%), followed by design (7), where it achieved a quality factor of 90%, and the least proposed designs in the axes as a whole is Design (8), where it achieved quality coefficients by (85).